Skip to content

The Floor
VOTES

Skip to page number selection
  • On Passage of the Bill: H.R.775 as Amended; A bill to establish certain procedures for civil actions brought for damages relating to the failure of any device or system to process or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the year 2000, and for other purposes. Result: Passed...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 624: Gregg Amendment No. 624 as Modified; To provide for the suspension of penalties for certain year 2000 failures by small business concerns. Result: Agreed to (71-28, 1 member not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On Passage of the Bill: H.R.775 as Amended; A bill to establish certain procedures for civil actions brought for damages relating to the failure of any device or system to process or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the year 2000, and for other purposes. Result: Passed...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 624: Gregg Amendment No. 624 as Modified; To provide for the suspension of penalties for certain year 2000 failures by small business concerns. Result: Agreed to (71-28, 1 member not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 621: Motion to Table Boxer Amdt. No.621, as Modified; To ensure that manufacturers provide Y2K fixes if available. Result: Agreed to (66-32, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 621: Motion to Table Boxer Amdt. No.621, as Modified; To ensure that manufacturers provide Y2K fixes if available. Result: Agreed to (66-32, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 620: Edwards Amendment No. 620; To provide that certain companies, selling non-Y2K-compliant products beginning in 1999, not be included under the protections as outlined in the substitute amendment. Result: Rejected (36-62, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details:...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 619: Edwards Amendment No. 619; To provide that a party to a Y2K action making a tort claim may only recover for economic losses to the extent allowed under applicable state or federal law in effect on January 1, 1999. Result: Rejected (41-57, 2 members not voting, 1/2...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 620: Edwards Amendment No. 620; To provide that certain companies, selling non-Y2K-compliant products beginning in 1999, not be included under the protections as outlined in the substitute amendment. Result: Rejected (36-62, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details:...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 619: Edwards Amendment No. 619; To provide that a party to a Y2K action making a tort claim may only recover for economic losses to the extent allowed under applicable state or federal law in effect on January 1, 1999. Result: Rejected (41-57, 2 members not voting, 1/2...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 611: Leahy Amdt. No. 6111; To exclude consumers from the Act's restrictions on seeking redress for the harm caused by Y2K computer failures. Result: Rejected (32-65, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 610: Motion to Table Kerry Amdt. No. 610; To regulate interstate commerce by making provision for dealing with losses arising from Year 2000 Problem-related failures that may disrupt communications, intermodal transportation, and other matters affecting interstate...
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 611: Leahy Amdt. No. 6111; To exclude consumers from the Act's restrictions on seeking redress for the harm caused by Y2K computer failures. Result: Rejected (32-65, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 610: Motion to Table Kerry Amdt. No. 610; To regulate interstate commerce by making provision for dealing with losses arising from Year 2000 Problem-related failures that may disrupt communications, intermodal transportation, and other matters affecting interstate...
  • On Passage of the Bill: S.1122, as amended; An original bill making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. Result: Passed (93-4, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 541: Motion to table Boxer Amdt. No. 541; To substitute for section 8106 (relating to operational support aircraft) a requirement for a report. Result: Agreed to (66-31, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On Passage of the Bill: S.1122, as amended; An original bill making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. Result: Passed (93-4, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 541: Motion to table Boxer Amdt. No. 541; To substitute for section 8106 (relating to operational support aircraft) a requirement for a report. Result: Agreed to (66-31, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 584: McCain Amendment No. 584; To reduce amounts appropriated for unrequested, low-priority, unnecessary, and wasteful spending. Result: Rejected (16-81, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]
  • On the Amendment S.Amdt. 584: McCain Amendment No. 584; To reduce amounts appropriated for unrequested, low-priority, unnecessary, and wasteful spending. Result: Rejected (16-81, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold) Details: [click here]